- Home
- About Us
- Our Clients
- Our Cases
- CVS
- Johnson & Johnson
- Leo Burnett
- Merck & Co.
- Northrop-Grumman
- Omnicare Kickbacks
- Omnicare Switching
- Par
- University of Chicago Medical Center
- Walgreens
- - CBS News Report
- - News Release
- - Case - Summary
- - Federal Press Release
- - Complaint
- - Federal Settlement Agreement
- - Participating States
- - NAMFCU Release
- - Arizona Settlement
- - Florida Release
- - Illinois Release
- - Indiana Release
- - Michigan Settlement
- - The Drugs
- - Company News Release
- - The Company
- Being a Whistleblower
- Types of FCA Cases
- False Claims Act Laws
- Contact Us
Chronology of a Typical Qui Tam Case
WHISTLEBLOWER DISCOVERS MISCONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT OR SIMILAR STATE STATUTES

WHISTLEBLOWER CONTACTS PRIVATE ATTORNEY

WHISTLEBLOWER AND ATTORNEY FURTHER EVALUATE WHETHER ILLEGAL CONDUCT HAS OCCURRED

WHISTLEBLOWER MAKES THE DECISION TO BRING A QUI TAM ACTION

WHISTLEBLOWER AND ATTORNEY DRAFT FCA COMPLAINT, FILE IT IN FEDERAL COURT UNDER SEAL, AND PROVIDE ALL EVIDENCE TO THE GOVERNMENT

THE GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATES THE ALLEGATIONS IN THE SEALED COMPLAINT

THE GOVERNMENT DECIDES TO INTERVENE IN THE LAWSUIT |
THE GOVERNMENT DECLINES TO INTERVENE IN THE LAWSUIT |
|
WHISTLEBLOWER AND PRIVATE ATTORNEY HELP THE GOVERNMENT PROSECUTE THE CASE |
WHISTLEBLOWER AND PRIVATE ATTORNEY DECIDE WHETHER TO PROSECUTE THE CASE THEMSELVES |



